New York Insurance

Direction: Given that national clamor for lowering auto insurance premiums also a proposal for an early solution to the attention of consumers and will enter into force for the insurance industry. The idea is simple: State laws that give the driver a choice between error and non-political mistake.

Given that national clamor for lowering auto insurance premiums also a proposal for an early solution to the attention of consumers and will enter into force for the insurance industry. The idea is simple: State laws that give the driver a choice between error and non-political mistake.

Drivers of private vehicles, can choose to be completed by political responsibility, with higher premiums or errors almost exclusively non-political, with lower premiums, not let the fact that individuals complain.

New project “Start”, a non-profit group of industry and consumers subsistence, it was found that products from USA in the adoption of the plan. Virginia Knauer, advisor of Consumer Affairs, President Nixon, Ford and Reagan, was named chairman of its national.

Certains”des USA are in a crisis situation immediately with a high level of auto insurance rates,’’said Knauer. ”We have a conversation about savings up to 30, 40, 50 per cent.”

At a national conference on auto insurance in Alexandria, Virginia, last month, Mrs. Knauer submitted the plan of his group, composed of proposals by Jeffrey O’Connell, a law professor at the University of Virginia, contributed write the first no-fault model law during the year 1966. New Jersey has established a similar approach to Jan 1, when it began to allow motorists the choice between the right to complain or approval not to try to justice, in most situations. “An approach gangbarer”

A leader of consumers, supports this dual strategy is James Brown, director of the Center for Consumer Affairs at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. ”This is a positive step,”he said. ”Given political realities, it is an approach gangbarer.”

Among the assurances of managers in favour of the concept is James F. Perry, Associate General Counsel of the State Farm Insurance Companies, the largest nation of the writer private automobile insurance. ”Our first reaction was that it was a heavy, uncomfortable idea,”he said. ”But how we react to the difficulties encountered in the right device, operating on no-fault insurance regulation, it seems to be an end to the dilemma.”

In no mistake, insurance is generally required for financial losses from their own insurance companies, whatever caused an accident. Nineteen years after Massachusetts adopted the first such law, only 14 States had no real mistakes systems. And few of them can appeal if the serious injury or permanent, as the State laws and regulations.

According to the Institute of Insurance Information in New York, ie no real assurance of debt are Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Kansas, Kentucky, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota , New Jersey, New York, North South Dakota and Utah. Three of them - Florida, Michigan and New York - have strong no-fault laws, within the limits of costumes automatic injuries.

Insurance companies, a sharp rise in prices of attack to say that premiums are nothing more than a reflection of their cost. Their reaction is to support the passage of no-fault legislation, particularly those who allow themselves only when serious injuries, the costs to better meet the needs.

”There is no doubt that insurance companies have a genuine obligation of man are violated,’’said John J. Martin, the chairman of Aetna Life and Casualty Company’s division of the personal financial security and the president of the Insurance Information Institute. ”But we have a commitment just as legitimate as people, not debt. What is-no-fault, is the low demand from the litigation environment.” ‘Fast, more equitable and humane ”

Robert Pike, a Senior Vice President and General Counsel of the Allstate Insurance Company, said:”No error provides several dollars of USA, the customer pays for new customers of the benefits. The error is based on waste, inefficiency and delays. From non-guilt is a rapid, just and humane way of compensating victims.